Week 4 Disc Plagiarism

Week4 Disc: Plagiarism

Author’sName

Week4 Disc: Plagiarism

Part1

Plagiarism(which is derived from a Latin word plagiare, meaning, &quottokidnap&quot) is the act of implying, or claiming the originalauthorship of (or using material from) another person`s creative orwritten work without adequate acknowledgement or proper citation.This can be in the entire or to some part of the work. Unlikeinstances of forgery, in which the authenticity of the written work,document, or some other kind of article remains in question,plagiarism is concerned with the issue of false attribution.Plagiarism can likewise happen unknowingly in a few societies,certain manifestations of literary theft are acknowledged because theidea can be interpreted in a different way.

Plagiarismis theft of someone else`s ideas or written work (Vicinus et al.,2009). In most cases, it happens when somebody takes statements orimpressions from another author`s composition and gives theimpression of being his work. Plagiarism is not a legitimate term. Itis frequently utilized as a part of lawsuits. Courts recognize actsof plagiarism as infringement of copyright law, particularly as thetheft of an alternate author`s intellectual property. Since copyrightlaw permits an assortment of creative works to be listed as thepossessions of their holders, claims alleging plagiarism can be basedon the appropriation of any manifestation of music, writing, andvisual pictures.

Thespirit of learning institutions is violated by all acts of academicdishonesty. For instance, plagiarism undermines the plagiarist`s ownparticular learning. Plagiarism is unfair to other students in theclass who do their own work. Plagiarism and other forms of academicdishonesty diminish the value of the degree for all understudies.Moreover, they damage the trust between the students and professors(Vicinus et al., 2009). Plagiarism can likewise harm the plagiarist.Conceivable punishments of obvious plagiarism with the clear motiveto cheat at learning institutions include:

  • Failure of the class assignment

  • Failure of the whole course (Understanding plagiarism and its consequences, 2011)

Additionally,plagiarism may be conferred with the motive to defraud however,sometimes plagiarized-work may be submitted unintentionally. This isthe reason it is essential for students to figure out how torecognize and avoid unoriginality. Obliviousness of the rules willnot be acknowledged as an excuse for submitting plagiarized work inmost learning establishments (Donnelly, 2012).

Withinacademia, plagiarism by researchers, professors, or students isviewed as scholastic fraud or academic dishonesty and guilty partiesare liable to scholarly censure (Vicinus et al., 2009). In the fieldof journalism, plagiarism is viewed as a breach of journalisticmorals, and columnists discovered plagiarizing normally facedisciplinary consequences varying from suspension from work totermination.

Afew people found plagiarizing in scholarly or journalistic contextsargue that they plagiarized unintentionally, by neglecting toincorporate citations or give the proper reference. While plagiarismin journalism and scholarship has long history, the improvement ofthe Internet, where articles appear as electronic content, has madethe physical demonstration of replicating the work of otherseffortless, basically by &quotcopy and paste&quot content startingwith one page then onto the next (Understanding plagiarism and itsconsequences, 2011).

Inconclusion, unless the professor indicates otherwise, it is expectedthat all assignments submitted for a grade is the learners own work.Work submitted as a part of an authorized cooperation shouldappropriately cited to the commitments of each author. At the pointwhen working with an accomplice or a group on a specific assignment,it is not difficult to transgress the line between plagiarism andgenuine collaboration. Unless otherwise indicated, the work a studentsubmits should be his/her own, in light of his/her own understandingand research. Moreover, at the point when two assignments submittedby two or more different scholars are fundamentally the same, aprofessor may assume plagiarism has happened.

Part2

Iagree with Leah, the writer of the first response. She takes a clearand perceptive position by arguing that plagiarism violates trustbetween the student and the professor by giving the professor falseinformation. However, if this statement may confuse the reader sinceLeah meant that plagiarism gives the professor a wrong impressionthat the student has understood the content the plagiarized materialis not wrong by itself. Leah explicitly asserts that plagiarism canhurt the plagiarist. According to her, plagiarism takes away thelearning experience that students should gain when they practice byworking on the assignments assigned by their professors. On furtherillustrations, the author asserts that a student cannot expecthis/her professor to be fair with the grades yet the student is notbeing fair to him/herself by doing original work.

Part3

Onthe second response, Denise tries to base her argument on the factthat undetected plagiarism can give the professor an impression thatother students are not serious since the plagiarist passed theassignment. According to Denise, A plagiarized paper can affect otherstudents because if it goes unnoticed the professor may look at theother students as though they do not understand the material and itcould affect the grading scale the teacher provides for the students.I totally agree with her. Denise argues that when a student graduatesfrom a learning institution, employers may think that that he/she iscapable of going into their dedicated work fields with the expertiseand knowledge from their education. On the off chance that thestudent used to use shortcuts such as plagiarism, the student who isnow an employee can lack the required expertise for the job.Considering these illustrations, Denise is right.

References

Vicinus,M., Eisner, C., &amp Eisner, Caroline. (2009). Originality,Imitation, And Plagiarism: Teaching Writing In The Digital Age.University of Michigan Press.

Understandingplagiarism and its consequences.(2011). Australia: VEA.

Donnelly,M. (2012). Criticalconversations about plagiarism.Anderson, S.C: Parlor Press.