325-Q161

AuthorsName

MarilynFrye`s introduction to feminism and her explicit discussions of themajor sensitive topics relevant to the modern society is pricelessand timeless. The plot of her short extraordinary book containsarticles and past lectures exhibiting analyses of how blacks andwhites, men and women, and gay people relate. Marilyn Frye examineswomen`s’ indignation and how the society responds to them in thepart &quotOn being White.&quot Though she approaches the subjectsfrom the perception of justice, the plot of her novel is deeplyengaged with the epistemology, metaphysics, and moral psychology ofsocial class.

Frye(1983) argues that whiteness is a political construct that includescharacterizing who is white and who is not. As indicated by Frye,being white is not a biological condition. It is continuously being apart of a particular political or social class, a classification thatis perseveringly kept up by those individuals who are in their andeach other’s discernment, most irrefutably in it. It is similar tobeing a part of a club, a fraternity, or a political party (Frye,1983).

Moreover,the author asserts that if an individual is born to individuals whoare members of that organization, he or she is standardized andaccepted into that club. An individual`s membership as if it was tosome degree, mandatory. No one gives the individual any option tomake a choice in the matter. Nonetheless, it is contingent and, inthe Aristotelian sense, incidental. The author states that memberscan bend the rules whenever, if that is important to attest themembers` sole and elite power to choose who is a part truth be told,bending the rules is a perfect expression of that power (Frye, 1983).

Asindicated by Frye, the idea of whiteness is not merely utilized, inthese cases, it is wielded. Whites practice power of characterizingwho is white and who is not, and are envious of that power. Forexample, if a light- skinned individual of &quotcolored&quotlineage claims to be white, and white persons discover theindividual`s background, they see that an individual who may be amarginal case has chosen what she is. Since the white individualcannot permit that choosing, the choice must be reversed.

Inconclusion, when a person has been definitively and clearly chosen tobe white by whites, her assertion that she is not white must beconfronted again since any individual who is even possibly in theborderline cannot be permitted to draw the line. To such anindividual, a white individual is asserting, &quotI have chosen youto be white so you are white, since what I say in regards to who iswhite and who is not is final&quot (Frye,1983).

Reference

Frye,M. (1983). “On Being White.” Thepolitics of reality: Essays in feminist theory.Trumansburg, N.Y: Crossing Press.