,

Argument-DrivenAnalysis of a Single Globalization Essay

Thereare people who claim that if parents do not communicate to theirchildren in their native language the children will havedifficulties in understanding or communicating in their mothertongues. However others assert that it is better to teach children auniversal language like English so that they can fit in differentsocial settings with ease. The article “The new Language Landscape”authored by Reshma Krishnamurthy Sharma tries to convince its readersthat children are losing touch with their native languages as Englishturns out to be the single spoken dialect. Theauthor effectively achieves her purpose since her arguments are wellexplained and illustrated using examples from different people toclarify her point.

Theauthor’s claim has a valid point. Sharma shows well-reasonedargument taking into account illustrations and evidences that depictchildren are speaking in English more than their native languagesespecially in the urban areas. For instance Sharma explains thatwhen Sandhya Rao asks her two-year-old daughter a question the childanswers in the English dialect. Through this example the authorconvinces the readers that English language is slowly becoming amother tongue in many homes day by day.

Asa result this leaves to the author asking a rhetoric question. Theauthor asks “Fifty years from now will we be surprised if Englishturn out to be the single spoken language and children go to speciallearning institutions to learn India`s local languages?” (Sharma1). Additionally the author adds that during that time peopleshould not be surprised if their children will have to attend schoolsoffering special language lessons in order to learn their nativelanguages.

Moreoverthe author’s arguments are not solely based on her ideas that sheoffers. She includes experiences of other people in order to base herpoints on a firm foundation. Hence readers can not acknowledge herargument as valid. The author includes people from differentprofessions to justify her point by using different perspectives. Forinstance she quotes Sandhya Rao who is a professional incommunication and Nandini Ashok an educator who runs a pre-school.

Theauthor uses Sheryl Pinto’s experience (a human resourceprofessional) as a woman who communicated to a three-year-old childin English since she was in a marriage that involved two differentlanguages. Pinto’s mother tongue is Konkani and her husband`slanguage is Bengali. In this case point the author illustrates thatsince the two parents were unable to learn each other’s languagethey decided to use English language while communicating to theirchild.

Stillthe author uses Chaitra Kiran’s example to show a different reasonfor choosing English language while communicating with her child.According to Kiran she speaks in her mother tongue (Kannada) yet sheis married to a husband with whom they share a native language. Kiranasserts that she feels that parents like her have begun to emphasizeEnglish language since they see that children cannot understand muchif they are not conversant with their native dialect. Additionallyby one means or another English has turned into the regular spokendialect in upscale apartments play territories and play areas.Therefore the author`s reasoning is well researched and drawn fromdifferent perspectives.

Theauthor`s evidence and the foundation for her argument have legitimateevidentiary support that make the purpose of her article acceptable.Furthermore the author proves her points are not assumptions byincluding experiences of other people to prove that children arelosing touch with their native languages as English turns into themost spoken dialect.

Moreoverthe author makes her argument stronger by providing explication ofher statement that English is the most spoken language especially inurban areas. This is because the author avoids basing her argumentson unproven assumptions. The author explains her key points in herarguments. Hence Sharma provides a foundation for her arguments.

Theauthor goes further to illustrate that children`s activity centersbook stores workplaces and play-homes encourage the use of Englishlanguage compared to any other dialect. The availability ofinternational learning institutions in towns and strict rules in evenstandard schools on the use of English as one common language has inone way or another influenced English into local homes too.

MoreoverSharma asserts that parents often believe that communicating inflawless English from a young age equips children to work in diverseglobal environments. These are reasons that make the author achieveher purpose effectively since her audience can relate and agree withher points. The illustrations that the author uses are real and arecurrently witnessed in the modern world. Hence her task of makingthe purpose of her the message (that children are losing touch withtheir native languages as English turns into the single spokendialect) effective is easy due to her tactical approach.

Theparent-child examples used by Sharma are understandable and easy torelate to. For instance when she asserts “A rising number ofchildren particularly in urban areas are using English languagewhile communicating more than any other dialect” (Sharma 1).Furthermore the topic that the author chose is currently affectingthe modern society. The author`s argument is logic and it is basedon supported evidences and substantiated explanations that make thereader receive her message effectively and conclude that the messagein her article is valid. Generally the author effectivelycommunicates her message to the audience and this makes the purposeof her article effective.

Summary

Theaim of this essay is to deliver an argument-driven analysis to thearticle “The new Language Landscape” by Reshma KrishnamurthySharma. This paper indicates that the author achieves her purposeeffectively. She does this by explaining further her thoughts usingexamples from different people. Moreover the author makes her claimsvalid by using examples that are happening currently and readers canrelate to. Examples and further illustrations are provided to supportthe thesis statement proving that the author’s argument childrenare losing touch with their native languages as English turns out tobe the single spoken dialect is logic.

WorksCited

SharmaReshma. Thenew language landscape. Today`sPaper 2012. Internet Resource. Webhttp://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-features/tp-metroplus/the-new-language-landscape/article2898053.ece